HEX-Core video editing computer

By how much can Shawn Lam’s 2012 Video Editing PC beat Jan Ozer’s 2009 Mac Pro?

 

This article is in response to Jan Ozer’s recent article in Streaming Media Producer entitled:
Benchmark Tests: Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 vs. Apple Final Cut Pro X“.

8 Core 2009 Mac Pro with 2.93 GHz Zeon 5500 processor

Video Production Article Discussion

I wasn’t too surprised by the results and appreciate that Ozer explained his testing parameters so that users would be able to compare his benchmarks to their own. I wasn’t expecting the stream of comments and bashing that ensued though from an individual who is a Final Cut trainer. I guess he is probably still upset at Apple for killing Final Cut Pro and replacing it with a consumer application called Final Cut X but he was a bit rude in his comments.

Full disclosure: Like Jan Ozer, I am a writer for Streaming Media Producer, and he disclosed in his article that the article in question was specifically sponsored by Adobe. I did not contribute to his article nor have I spoken with him or anyone at Streaming Media Producer or Adobe with regards to the article in question and am writing this all on my own while I wait for a few GB of video to finish uploading before I can quit for the day.

Video Production Article Response

10 days after Ozer’s Benchmark Tests article was written there were several comments about render times but no one was willing to provide any of their own benchmarks to back-up their comments and opinions. I decided to run a few quick tests. I had no interest in seeing if Final Cut Pro X is anywhere as fast as Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 is because I already knew the answer: when paired with an NVIDIA CUDA GPU accelerating video card, Premiere Pro is the fastest video editing system.

I have to agree that the set-up wasn’t exactly a fair fight for FCP X because Adobe has a huge advantage when paired with an approved NVIDIA CUDA card. But this type of test is designed to showcase the advantage of one over the other and it is a fair comparison, even if FCP X never had a chance. Sure FCP X might be able to close the gap a little with a Radeon 5870 card but then Premiere could pull away even further if you paired it with a modern NVIDIA card too. Keep in mind the Quadro FX4800 card that Ozer used in his tests was released in late 2008 and is even older than Jan’s 2009 test system, although that is pretty current for a Mac Pro 😉

When it comes to speed, the newer FX4000 card would have produced even faster results for Premiere and it is also available in Mac and PC versions. The FX6000 is even faster and a Maximus configuration, combining a Tesla C2075 with a Quadro 2000, 4000, or 6000, even faster.

Heck, all of the GeForce cards are faster than the FX4800. I demonstrated this last year in my Adobe Premiere Pro CS5.5 review in EventDV Magazine.

I decided to run a few numbers of my own because I know I could get even faster render times with Premiere Pro CS6 on my new 2012 Video Editing Computer Build, which I have an entire blog post dedicated to and has been discussed on the Adobe Forums and featured on the Videoguys Blog.

HEX-Core video editing computer

Shawn's Hex-core Intel Core i7 3930K Video Editing Computer


Premiere Pro CS6 Benchmarks

Premiere Pro CS6 benchmarks

I recreated Jan’s AVCHD tests and my 60 second 1080 30P timeline took only 58 seconds for a 10 Mbps 720P VBR 2 pass H.264 export of a single track of color corrected footage with GPU enabled. By my count that is more than 3x faster than Ozer’s 3m10s.

I then created a 3 layer timeline with moving and opposite opacity settings on my first two color corrected tracks, which sat on top of a color corrected video track. My times were only 1m13s, which is 3.77x faster than Ozer’s results.

I then disabled the GPU for the 3 layer opacity test and it took 6m31s. Ozer didn’t test this workflow but I like to remind myself just how much a difference the GPU acceleration is making to my render times. My time without GPU acceleration beat Ozer’s FCPX time by 1m46s although this isn’t a fair test for FCP X because my hex-core video editing computer is newer and faster than the quad core system that Ozer was testing on and I’m unable to test Mac software on a PC.

So there you have it – some hard numbers that I challenge anyone to beat with their choice of video editing software and computer system.

2 replies
  1. Tanya Vandenberg says:

    My partner and I both run CS5 Production Suite, me on my Mac, and he on his PC. We’ve had our setup like that since we started our company, and we swop projects back and forth and work seamlessly. But we also work with other freelancers and production houses who are almost all FCP – and I cannot begin to tell you how much heartache that causes! We now have a Canon XF300 – and not a single one of the FCP guys copes with the footage, no matter what the size of their machines. It’s a nightmare… So much time lost in conversion, and then countless problems and slow-downs. For us, it’s just no contest. We work in the native format, no problem.

    Thanks for the excellent content – it’s hard to find anyone who writes tech production stuff well. Keep up the good work! 🙂

  2. Sonicjar Music says:

    I heard that there are lots of improvements and memory footprint improvement in CS6. Did not get chance to try it out. Still on CS5 and its still better than FCP X. Apple is lagging on software front big time. Same is the story with Logic 9. They have not pushed any new upgrade since 2 years.

Comments are closed.